subs + .wmv

Hi there, since I've upgraded from XP to W7 ; I'm having big trouble with my old video stuffs. I cannot read most of my old wmv video subtitles.
It worked as a charm with klite 475, but it won't with the latest versions (currently I'm using klite 1375 mega)
So I need your help once again and thanks in advance.

What kind of subtitle files are they?

Subs are .SRT and the video
ID : 2
Format : VC-1
Format profile : MP@ML
Codec ID : WMV3
Codec ID/Info : Windows Media Video 9
Codec ID/Hint : WMV3
Description of the codec : Windows Media Video 9
Duration : 14 min 53 s
Bit rate mode : Constant
Bit rate : 864 kb/s
Width : 480 pixels
Height : 270 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate : 29.970 (29970/1000) FPS
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Progressive
Compression mode : Lossy
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.222
Stream size : 92.1 MiB (91%)

Audio
ID : 1
Format : WMA
Format version : Version 2
Codec ID : 161
Codec ID/Info : Windows Media Audio
Description of the codec : Windows Media Audio 9.1 - 128 kbps, 48 kHz, stereo (A/V) 1-pass CBR
Duration : 14 min 53 s
Bit rate mode : Constant
Bit rate : 128 kb/s
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Sampling rate : 48.0 kHz
Bit depth : 16 bits
Stream size : 13.6 MiB (14%)

Those should load just fine if you use MPC-HC as player. Subtitle file should have same name as the video.

Excuse me for wasting your time; it appears that the klite475 could read .srt subs such as
1
00.00.00,000-->00.00.0,000
....

But the latest version could just read subs edited like this

1
00.00.00,000 --> 00.00.0,000

And yes as I created this subs I know it should have the same name as matching videos.

Thank you again for your reply and sorry for bothering you

The first subtitle is not valid SRT.

You can use a text-editor to quickly replace "-->" with " --> ".

Did create it 8 years ago and did watch it several times and the fact that's a true srt or not does not matter 'cuz K-Lite 475 Codec Pack Setup did decrypted it perfectly when I was using XP SP2.

And thanks for the advice (that's what I did)

That version is nine years old. It is possible that it may have handled incorrect SRT at some point.

I assume that the nine year version could read what the current versions couldn't ; that's all